I've read an interesting article. It claimed that, just like poetry, philosophy cannot be taught. This made me question the role of the philosopher, if philosophy, as the article suggests, cannot be the subject of direct teaching.
It is well known that wellness is nowadays a marketing product. Minds, with bodies devastated by sedentariness and an oppressive lifestyle, need crutches in the form of products (courses, counseling sessions, diets) to be purchased with the illusion that such products will solve a problem whose solution would actually be different.
I have always been convinced that the quality and dignity of life are the only important variables. Attachment to quantity is the offspring of a society with no values left.
I have been teaching philosophy for almost twenty years, I have written a few books, I strive to communicate certain values, yet I have come to the conclusion that understanding is useless.
I happened to hear this sentence that honestly sent chills down my spine. An instructor/teacher teaches and supports students educationally through the acquisition of techniques.
I was asked about my D'Annunzio sympathies because it's considered fascist. Hence, I am writing this post to clarify once again my own personal view, be it clear not that of the school, on society and politics.